ADVERSE SELECTION AND AN INDIVIDUAL MANDATE: WHEN THEORY MEETS PRACTICE By

نویسندگان

  • Martin B. Hackmann
  • Jonathan T. Kolstad
  • Amanda E. Kowalski
  • Marika Cabral
چکیده

We develop a model of selection that incorporates a key element of recent health reforms: an individual mandate. We identify a set of key parameters for welfare analysis, allowing us to model the welfare impact of the actual policy as well as to estimate the socially optimal penalty level. Using data from Massachusetts, we estimate the key parameters of the model. We compare health insurance coverage, premiums, and insurer average health claim expenditures between Massachusetts and other states in the periods before and after the passage of Massachusetts health reform. In the individual market for health insurance, we find that premiums and average costs decreased significantly in response to the individual mandate; consistent with an initially adversely selected insurance market. We are also able to recover an estimated willingness-to-pay for health insurance. Combining demand and cost estimates as sufficient statistics for welfare analysis, we find an annual welfare gain of $335 dollars per person or $71 million annually in Massachusetts as a result of the reduction in adverse selection. We also find evidence for smaller post-reform markups in the individual market, which increased welfare by another $107 dollars per person per year and about $23 million per year overall. To put this in perspective, the total welfare gains were 8.4% of medical expenditures paid by insurers. Our model and empirical estimates suggest an optimal mandate penalty of $2,190. A penalty of this magnitude would increase health insurance to near universal levels. Our estimated optimal penalty is higher than the individual mandate penalty adopted in Massachusetts but close to the penalty implemented under the ACA. ∗We thank Kate Archibald and Xu “Sophie” He for excellent research assistance. This project has benefited greatly from comments from Marika Cabral, Keith Ericson, Mathis Wagner, Ebonya Washington, and Heidi Williams. We are also grateful for comments by seminar participants at Yale and the University of Pennsylvania and participants at the health care markets conference at the Kellogg School of Management. Funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the National Institute on Aging grant #P30 AG012810 is gratefully acknowledged. Contact information: [email protected], 203-298-2916, [email protected], 215-573-9075, [email protected], 202-670-7631.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Adverse Selection and an Individual Mandate: When Theory Meets Practice.

We develop a model of selection that incorporates a key element of recent health reforms: an individual mandate. Using data from Massachusetts, we estimate the parameters of the model. In the individual market for health insurance, we find that premiums and average costs decreased significantly in response to the individual mandate. We find an annual welfare gain of 4.1% per person or $51.1 mil...

متن کامل

Nber Working Paper Series Adverse Selection and an Individual Mandate: When Theory Meets Practice

We develop a model of selection that incorporates a key element of recent health reforms: an individual mandate. We identify a set of key parameters for welfare analysis, allowing us to model the welfare impact of the actual policy as well as to estimate the socially optimal penalty level. Using data from Massachusetts, we estimate the key parameters of the model. We compare health insurance co...

متن کامل

Fundamentals of Medical Physiology

as “adverse selection.” One way to prevent adverse selection is to promote the formation of groups, or alliances, for purchasing insurance that will spread the associated risk and make premiums more affordable. Adverse selection has garnered extensive political attention. It served as the driver behind the Clinton proposal to create “regional health alliances,” and it prompted the individual ma...

متن کامل

Online Appendix to Hackmann, Kolstad, and Kowalski “Adverse Selection and an Individual Mandate: When Theory

Our model addresses selection at the extensive margin and abstracts from intensive margin selection amongst differentiated plan. Our modeling decision follows naturally from the policy intervention, the individual mandate, which affects the demand for health insurance in general. While our framework may not be accurate in other contexts, we think that the modeling assumptions are sensible in th...

متن کامل

Does Awareness of the Affordable Care Act Reduce Adverse Selection? A Study of the Long-term Uninsured in South Carolina

Adverse selection predicts that individuals with lower health status would be more likely to sign up for health insurance. This hypothesis was tested among the long-term uninsured population in South Carolina (SC). This study used data from an in-person survey conducted from May 2014 to January 2015. Interviews were held with the long-term uninsured individuals at multiple sites throughout the ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013